Published Date : 20/10/2025
European politicians are increasingly leveraging artificial intelligence (AI) tools to inform policy decisions, a trend that is reshaping the political landscape. To explore this phenomenon, POLITICO conducted an experiment with three different AI chatbots: OpenAI's ChatGPT, Anthropic's Claude, and Google's Bard. Each chatbot was asked a series of questions related to European policy, and the responses were analyzed to understand the potential benefits and challenges of AI in politics.
The use of AI in policy-making is not without controversy. Critics argue that AI systems can perpetuate biases and lack the nuanced understanding of complex human issues. However, proponents believe that AI can provide valuable insights and help policymakers make more informed decisions.
The Experiment
To conduct the experiment, POLITICO prepared a set of questions covering various aspects of European policy, including economic development, environmental sustainability, and social issues. Each chatbot was asked the same questions to ensure a fair comparison.
ChatGPT by OpenAI
ChatGPT, developed by OpenAI, is one of the most well-known AI chatbots. It is known for its ability to generate human-like text and provide detailed responses. When asked about economic development in Europe, ChatGPT provided a comprehensive overview of the current economic landscape and suggested several policy recommendations, such as increasing investment in technology and education.
Claude by Anthropic
Claude, developed by Anthropic, is another advanced AI chatbot. It is designed to be more conversational and adaptable. When asked about environmental sustainability, Claude emphasized the importance of renewable energy and sustainable practices. It also suggested specific policies, such as carbon pricing and incentives for green technology.
Bard by Google
Google's Bard is a cutting-edge AI chatbot that is known for its ability to handle complex queries. When asked about social issues, such as immigration and healthcare, Bard provided detailed and balanced responses. It highlighted the need for inclusive policies and the importance of addressing social inequalities.
Analysis and Implications
The responses from the chatbots were analyzed to evaluate their accuracy, relevance, and potential impact on policy-making. While each chatbot provided valuable insights, there were also notable differences in their approaches and recommendations.
ChatGPT, for instance, tended to provide more detailed and data-driven responses, which could be particularly useful for policymakers looking for concrete evidence to support their decisions. Claude, on the other hand, was more conversational and adaptable, making it a good choice for engaging with the public and stakeholders. Bard, with its ability to handle complex queries, was particularly effective in providing nuanced and balanced responses on social issues.
Challenges and Considerations
Despite the potential benefits, the use of AI in policy-making also presents several challenges. One of the main concerns is the risk of bias. AI systems are only as good as the data they are trained on, and if the data is biased, the AI's recommendations will be biased as well. Additionally, there is a risk that AI systems could be used to manipulate public opinion or sway policy decisions in favor of certain interests.
Another challenge is the lack of transparency and accountability. Unlike human policymakers, AI systems do not have a clear chain of accountability. It can be difficult to trace the decision-making process and understand how the AI arrived at its recommendations.
Conclusion
The use of AI chatbots in European policy-making is a growing trend that has the potential to revolutionize the way decisions are made. While the benefits are significant, it is crucial to address the challenges and ensure that AI is used in a responsible and ethical manner. By carefully considering the implications and working to mitigate the risks, European policymakers can harness the power of AI to create more informed and effective policies.
About the Author
This article is a collaborative effort by POLITICO's editorial team, focusing on the intersection of technology and politics. For more insights and analysis, visit our website and follow us on social media.
Q: What are the main AI chatbots used in the experiment?
A: The main AI chatbots used in the experiment were OpenAI's ChatGPT, Anthropic's Claude, and Google's Bard.
Q: What were the key findings of the experiment?
A: The key findings included the ability of each chatbot to provide detailed, data-driven responses, conversational adaptability, and nuanced recommendations on various policy issues.
Q: What are the main challenges of using AI in policy-making?
A: The main challenges include the risk of bias, lack of transparency, and the potential for manipulation of public opinion or policy decisions.
Q: How can policymakers address the risks associated with AI in policy-making?
A: Policymakers can address the risks by ensuring the use of unbiased data, maintaining transparency, and establishing clear accountability mechanisms.
Q: What is the potential impact of AI on European policy?
A: The potential impact includes more informed and effective policies, but it also requires careful consideration of ethical and practical challenges.