Legal Challenges of AI-Generated Education in Jordan

Published Date : 6/10/2025 

This article explores the legal deficiencies in protecting AI-generated educational content in Jordan, highlighting the need for modernized intellectual property laws. 

The rapid digitization of educational content has brought about significant challenges, especially in the realm of artificial intelligence (AI). In Jordan, the legal framework for protecting AI-generated educational content is severely lacking, creating a gap that needs urgent attention. This study aims to identify and address these legal deficiencies to ensure that the intellectual property (IP) rights of creators are adequately protected in the digital age.

Jordan's intellectual property laws currently do not have explicit provisions for AI-generated works. This is particularly problematic when it comes to non-human authorship, algorithmic reproduction, and the generation of derivative works. The ambiguity in these areas can lead to legal disputes and undermine the protection of AI-generated content.

To address these issues, the study employs a doctrinal-comparative methodology. It analyzes Jordanian laws, international treaties, and the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) AI-IP framework. The research also benchmarks Jordan's legal framework against those of France, Egypt, the United Arab Emirates (UAE), the United States (USA), and the United Kingdom (UK). Secondary data, including IP enforcement statistics, cybercrime assessments, and a SWOT analysis of the Digital Inclusion Strategy, further validate the findings.

The analysis reveals three critical gaps in Jordan's legal framework:

1. Doctrinal Ambiguity in AI Attribution : There is a lack of clear guidelines on how to attribute authorship to AI-generated works. This ambiguity can lead to legal uncertainty and disputes over ownership and rights.

2. Procedural Enforcement Underperformance : The current enforcement mechanisms are inadequate to handle the complexities of protecting AI-generated content. This can result in ineffective protection and lack of deterrence against infringement.

3. Limited Cross-Border Legal Cooperation : The global nature of AI-generated content requires robust cross-border legal cooperation. However, Jordan's current legal framework lacks the necessary mechanisms to facilitate this cooperation.

To address these gaps, the study proposes a tripartite reform framework:

1. Statutory Recognition of AI Authorship : This involves amending the existing IP laws to explicitly recognize AI as a legitimate source of authorship. Clear guidelines on the attribution of rights and responsibilities would help reduce legal uncertainty.

2. Blockchain-Based Attribution Protocols : Implementing blockchain technology can provide a secure and transparent mechanism for attributing authorship and ownership of AI-generated content. This would enhance the integrity and reliability of the IP protection system.

3. Regional Evidence-Sharing Mechanisms : Establishing regional mechanisms for sharing evidence and best practices can improve cross-border legal cooperation. This would help in the effective enforcement of IP laws and deter international infringements.

The proposed reforms aim to modernize Jordan's digital IP governance, ensuring that the legal framework is aligned with the technological advancements in AI. The insights gained from this study are not only relevant to Jordan but can also serve as a scalable model for other Global South jurisdictions facing similar challenges.

In conclusion, the protection of AI-generated educational content is a complex issue that requires a multifaceted approach. By addressing the identified gaps and implementing the proposed reforms, Jordan can create a robust legal framework that supports innovation and protects the rights of creators in the digital age. 

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQS): 

Q: What are the main legal gaps in protecting AI-generated content in Jordan?

A: The main legal gaps include doctrinal ambiguity in AI attribution, procedural enforcement underperformance, and limited cross-border legal cooperation.

Q: How does the study propose to address these gaps?

A: The study proposes a tripartite reform framework: statutory recognition of AI authorship, blockchain-based attribution protocols, and regional evidence-sharing mechanisms.

Q: Why is it important to protect AI-generated educational content?

A: Protecting AI-generated educational content is crucial to ensure that creators are fairly compensated, to foster innovation, and to maintain the integrity of the educational ecosystem.

Q: What role does blockchain technology play in protecting AI-generated content?

A: Blockchain technology provides a secure and transparent mechanism for attributing authorship and ownership, enhancing the integrity and reliability of the IP protection system.

Q: How can other countries benefit from Jordan's proposed reforms?

A: Other countries, especially those in the Global South, can benefit from Jordan's proposed reforms by using them as a scalable model to modernize their own digital IP governance frameworks. 

More Related Topics :